Many a book in history gained notoriety
for it's content and got itself banned
in one country but remained published
in the rest of the world, in translation.
Such was the fate of 'The Well Of Loneliness'
which was banned in the UK in 1929
in a trail that the press made hay with,
or rather sold acres of newsprint
on the back of as the judge
revelled in being quoted in the press.
The crime of the book was it's unrepentant
mixing of gender. As 'she' became 'he'
so the relationships in it were lesbian
with one partner decidedly masculine.
Radclyffe Hall's book was banned
in the same era in which 'Lady Chatterly's Lover'
was bowdlerised to please the ruling classes.
The crime of the book was it's unrepentant
mixing of gender. As 'she' became 'he'
so the relationships in it were lesbian
with one partner decidedly masculine.
Radclyffe Hall's book was banned
in the same era in which 'Lady Chatterly's Lover'
was bowdlerised to please the ruling classes.
Hall's book was republished legally
in the UK in 1957, fourteen years
after the it's author died,
with far less fuss than Lawrence's book
courted in the courts three years later
with far less fuss than Lawrence's book
courted in the courts three years later
where lawyers publicly fought
to get the book published as written,
to get the book published as written,
whilst mocking censorship with gusto.
But banning a book
But banning a book
and then making it legal
does not make it readable;
it merely makes the book notorious
and the trail more interesting
than the book ever could be.
No comments:
Post a Comment