Is the present dilema of 'the free (Western) world'
and the less aligned BRIC* countries have to navigate.
As America continues to be misled by its present leader.
Stalled, or more likely frozen, is presently the likely option
- the most common choice between the USA and Canada,
where late in the deal the framework was altered,
and the alterations were summarily publicly rejected.
Back in the day, how free the freeworld was
was tracked the same way that trade was measured
- by the depth of the civility between citizens and nations.
Nothing was absolute, but there was a direction of travel
that was clearly worth going in. On present day trends
few will recognise it when America realises how many friends
it has lost, after it has torn up so many deals it once used to support.
Or how much tearing up the old deals shrinks the world we live in.
But then shrinkage rarely recognises itself through it's actions
as it slices through the world, seeking only to further itself.
I don't know how many countries America is in different stages
of negotiations with who don't knw where their negotiations are at.
Just as America does not know where it with in it's deal with itself
Of the smaller countries many have completed their deals,
according to trackers of how much work has been completed.
Other countries, including the UK and Japan, have frameworks,
which have been oversold of as agreements, where very litttle
is final about what has been settled: whatever has been agreed
can be recinded the following day depending on the days
the president and his ministers have been having.
Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed,
which is when the deal might truly be said to be
truly 'locked down', until then little is known atall.
Everything that is not signed up can stall, be disagreed,
or frozen by both parties at any time, and the whole world watches
for future deals to be unravelled in the name of 'freedon of choice.'.
*Brazil, Russia, India and China
