Many organizations prefer
'arms length relationships'
with the folks, and the issues,
which they actively dislike
being forced to deal with,
but which by law they must.
Their detachment in fielding out
their difficulties is much admired
by our modern media. We are told
that companies are 'being objective'
when they behave this way.
But is this really the case?
It is more likely that they are
paying handsome sums, to make sure
their backsides are very well upholstered
against accusations of improper behavior.
'arms length relationships'
with the folks, and the issues,
which they actively dislike
being forced to deal with,
but which by law they must.
Their detachment in fielding out
their difficulties is much admired
by our modern media. We are told
that companies are 'being objective'
when they behave this way.
But is this really the case?
It is more likely that they are
paying handsome sums, to make sure
their backsides are very well upholstered
against accusations of improper behavior.